<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mashing up the enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kemsleydesign.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>After visiting MashupCamp last week (this comment posted 26/02/06), I think that's going to change. The tools and techniques are starting to mature and I believe that the line between enterprise composite applications and internet mashups is to to start to blend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After visiting MashupCamp last week (this comment posted 26/02/06), I think that&#8217;s going to change. The tools and techniques are starting to mature and I believe that the line between enterprise composite applications and internet mashups is to to start to blend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kemsleydesign.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that the notion of composite applications is IDENTICAL to what I outline above, although I agree that many of the popular social-networking mashups today are primarily read-only.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After spending this week at MashupCamp (comment posted Feb 23rd), I believe that the differences between composite applications and mashups are practically indistinguishable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the notion of composite applications is IDENTICAL to what I outline above, although I agree that many of the popular social-networking mashups today are primarily read-only.</p>
<p>After spending this week at MashupCamp (comment posted Feb 23rd), I believe that the differences between composite applications and mashups are practically indistinguishable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SS</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kemsleydesign.com/2006/01/mashing-up-the-enterprise/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Sandy,

The notion of composite applications is somewhat similar to what you outline above - the one difference I see is that composite applications are fairly transaction rich (create, update, delete), while a number of the mashups today are primarily read-only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy,</p>
<p>The notion of composite applications is somewhat similar to what you outline above - the one difference I see is that composite applications are fairly transaction rich (create, update, delete), while a number of the mashups today are primarily read-only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
