<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separating rules and process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Please don&#8217;t just &#8220;unify&#8221; rules and process &#124; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-6779</link>
		<dc:creator>Please don&#8217;t just &#8220;unify&#8221; rules and process &#124; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-6779</guid>
		<description>[...] Separating rules and process (Sandy Kemsley) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Separating rules and process (Sandy Kemsley) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5015</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5015</guid>
		<description>Scott, I&#039;d love to hear more of your thoughts on this. The reason that I see Pega&#039;s position as a disadvantage is that although Pega could be your enterprise rule repository, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a significant part of their business. If an enterprise wants an enterprise rule engine/repository, they&#039;re going to pick one of the vendors who are squarely on this space, not (in my opinion) a vendor who primarily uses it as a platform for their BPM product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I&#8217;d love to hear more of your thoughts on this. The reason that I see Pega&#8217;s position as a disadvantage is that although Pega could be your enterprise rule repository, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a significant part of their business. If an enterprise wants an enterprise rule engine/repository, they&#8217;re going to pick one of the vendors who are squarely on this space, not (in my opinion) a vendor who primarily uses it as a platform for their BPM product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5014</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5014</guid>
		<description>Good post, although have to disagree that Pega&#039;s position is a disadvantage.

Pega is first and foremost a rule engine - so you could use it as your enterprise repository without needing to employ the BPMS aspects.  It also provides easy integration of external services; so conversely you can also use it as a bpms and call out to a different engine if needs be.

Pega&#039;s big advantage is the seamlessness of the environment.  You really do get compelling benefit from using it both as a rules engine &amp; BPMS.  If you want to use an external you&#039;re no worse off than Tibco where the integration between the rules engine and BPMS is very thin.

(Note I&#039;ve no allegiance to Pega but have just finished an in-depth eval of it vs. Tibco).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, although have to disagree that Pega&#8217;s position is a disadvantage.</p>
<p>Pega is first and foremost a rule engine &#8211; so you could use it as your enterprise repository without needing to employ the BPMS aspects.  It also provides easy integration of external services; so conversely you can also use it as a bpms and call out to a different engine if needs be.</p>
<p>Pega&#8217;s big advantage is the seamlessness of the environment.  You really do get compelling benefit from using it both as a rules engine &#038; BPMS.  If you want to use an external you&#8217;re no worse off than Tibco where the integration between the rules engine and BPMS is very thin.</p>
<p>(Note I&#8217;ve no allegiance to Pega but have just finished an in-depth eval of it vs. Tibco).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise Decision Management - a Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise Decision Management - a Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CEP needs business rules too&lt;/strong&gt;

I saw a comment on IT Analysis that talked about The difference between complex event processing and event stream processing. I liked the distinction drawn but have to take issue with the comment Philip makes agreeing with a CEP vendor about &quot;why and...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CEP needs business rules too</strong></p>
<p>I saw a comment on IT Analysis that talked about The difference between complex event processing and event stream processing. I liked the distinction drawn but have to take issue with the comment Philip makes agreeing with a CEP vendor about &#8220;why and&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Taylor's Decision Management</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5019</link>
		<dc:creator>James Taylor's Decision Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 22:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5019</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Some business rules principles (after Ron Ross)&lt;/strong&gt;

I was reading Ron Ross&#039; book Principles of the Business Rules Approach (reviewed here) and thought his basic principles deserved both an airing on this blog and some additional &quot;sub principles&quot; when applied to the automation of decisions using busine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Some business rules principles (after Ron Ross)</strong></p>
<p>I was reading Ron Ross&#8217; book Principles of the Business Rules Approach (reviewed here) and thought his basic principles deserved both an airing on this blog and some additional &#8220;sub principles&#8221; when applied to the automation of decisions using busine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Debevoise</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5013</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Debevoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 01:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5013</guid>
		<description>Sandy

I think Tibco&#039;s BRE is cordicon, if I am not mistaken.

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy</p>
<p>I think Tibco&#8217;s BRE is cordicon, if I am not mistaken.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Taylor's Decision Management</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5018</link>
		<dc:creator>James Taylor's Decision Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 04:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5018</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Platforms, platforms, platforms&lt;/strong&gt;

Tower Group&#039;s Jerry Silva recently published on &quot;.NET vs. J2EE: Does the Future of Service-Orientation Hang on Myth and Misconception&quot; He has some great data on platform preferences in various industries, especially banking, and about how people perc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Platforms, platforms, platforms</strong></p>
<p>Tower Group&#8217;s Jerry Silva recently published on &#8220;.NET vs. J2EE: Does the Future of Service-Orientation Hang on Myth and Misconception&#8221; He has some great data on platform preferences in various industries, especially banking, and about how people perc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5017</link>
		<dc:creator>Fair Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5017</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fair Isaac&lt;/strong&gt;

The following discloses our information gathering andBurt Helm reports for Business Week on increasing co...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fair Isaac</strong></p>
<p>The following discloses our information gathering andBurt Helm reports for Business Week on increasing co&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise Decision Management - a Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/comment-page-1/#comment-5016</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise Decision Management - a Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/02/separating-rules-and-process/#comment-5016</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keeping rules and process separate, but linked&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice post by Sandy Kemsley on ebizq - Separating rules and process. Don&#039;t think I need to add anything to this one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keeping rules and process separate, but linked</strong></p>
<p>Nice post by Sandy Kemsley on ebizq &#8211; Separating rules and process. Don&#8217;t think I need to add anything to this one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
