<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Short History of BPM, Part 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Koopmans</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-18964</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Koopmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/#comment-18964</guid>
		<description>Hi Sandy,

Thank you for sharing your view on BPM history!
Really nicely writen and good input on my current assignment.

Hugo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sandy,</p>
<p>Thank you for sharing your view on BPM history!<br />
Really nicely writen and good input on my current assignment.</p>
<p>Hugo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-5161</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/#comment-5161</guid>
		<description>I think BPM does his work when in hands of smart operators what I doubt is an often case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think BPM does his work when in hands of smart operators what I doubt is an often case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ogren's BPM Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-5162</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ogren's BPM Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/#comment-5162</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Back to Blogging&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorry to be missing from the blog scene for so long. I spent a couple of weeks spreading the BPM vision within BEA and then a couple of weeks off. Luckily this means that I&#039;ve had some time to do &quot;deep thinking&quot; and have some ideas for blog posts. Un...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Back to Blogging</strong></p>
<p>Sorry to be missing from the blog scene for so long. I spent a couple of weeks spreading the BPM vision within BEA and then a couple of weeks off. Luckily this means that I&#8217;ve had some time to do &#8220;deep thinking&#8221; and have some ideas for blog posts. Un&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-5160</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/#comment-5160</guid>
		<description>The day that anyone at IBM pays enough attention to me to even consider looking out a window (metaphorically speaking), much less jumping out of one, I can&#039;t even imagine what I&#039;d do. :)

I&#039;m aware of IBM&#039;s human-facing workflow efforts, and they have always been substandard compared to their competitors at the time, in my opinion.

As for the integration side, I said that Websphere MQ was &quot;a&quot; cornerstone of their strategy, not the only thing in it, and I&#039;m speaking more from the point of view of how this stuff is actually being used in organizations that I work with as opposed to how IBM marketing would like it to be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day that anyone at IBM pays enough attention to me to even consider looking out a window (metaphorically speaking), much less jumping out of one, I can&#8217;t even imagine what I&#8217;d do. <img src='http://www.column2.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m aware of IBM&#8217;s human-facing workflow efforts, and they have always been substandard compared to their competitors at the time, in my opinion.</p>
<p>As for the integration side, I said that Websphere MQ was &#8220;a&#8221; cornerstone of their strategy, not the only thing in it, and I&#8217;m speaking more from the point of view of how this stuff is actually being used in organizations that I work with as opposed to how IBM marketing would like it to be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-5159</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/06/a-short-history-of-bpm-part-8/#comment-5159</guid>
		<description>Sandy,
I don&#039;t really have a problem with your list, but I don&#039;t agree with your characterization of IBM and BEA.  IBM has been doing human workflow almost as long as FileNet, and a lot of that functionality has found its way into WebSphere v6.  Also, the BPM marketing guys there must be jumping out the window to hear that the cornerstone of their BPM strategy is MQ.  WebSphere Business Modeler and Monitor are the cornerstone of BPM for IBM, what sets it apart from SOA.
We all noted how weird it looked when BEA bought Fuego, but unless you know something I don&#039;t, the bigger worry now is that BEA is ignoring its strengths in SOA and focusing too much on human-centric processes... not the other way around.  I look for BEA to integrate ESB with the Fuego stuff, but not to redirect BPM to mean business integration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy,<br />
I don&#8217;t really have a problem with your list, but I don&#8217;t agree with your characterization of IBM and BEA.  IBM has been doing human workflow almost as long as FileNet, and a lot of that functionality has found its way into WebSphere v6.  Also, the BPM marketing guys there must be jumping out the window to hear that the cornerstone of their BPM strategy is MQ.  WebSphere Business Modeler and Monitor are the cornerstone of BPM for IBM, what sets it apart from SOA.<br />
We all noted how weird it looked when BEA bought Fuego, but unless you know something I don&#8217;t, the bigger worry now is that BEA is ignoring its strengths in SOA and focusing too much on human-centric processes&#8230; not the other way around.  I look for BEA to integrate ESB with the Fuego stuff, but not to redirect BPM to mean business integration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

