<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments on the IBM-FileNet acquisition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 : WebSphere BPM Product Portfolio Technical Update</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 : WebSphere BPM Product Portfolio Technical Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>[...] do it all in the future? Given that my recommendation at the time of the FileNet acquisition was to rip out BPM and move it over to the WebSphere portfolio, and the spirited response that I had recently to a post about customers not wanting 3 BPMSs, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do it all in the future? Given that my recommendation at the time of the FileNet acquisition was to rip out BPM and move it over to the WebSphere portfolio, and the spirited response that I had recently to a post about customers not wanting 3 BPMSs, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM Buying Lombardi: A Bauble on their BPM Christmas Tree?</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-13544</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM Buying Lombardi: A Bauble on their BPM Christmas Tree?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-13544</guid>
		<description>[...] will become part of the WebSphere team, which is what I said that they should have done with FileNet’s BPM three years ago when that acquisition ha...; maybe they’ll do this one right so that the product actually becomes an integral part of IBM’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will become part of the WebSphere team, which is what I said that they should have done with FileNet’s BPM three years ago when that acquisition ha&#8230;; maybe they’ll do this one right so that the product actually becomes an integral part of IBM’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 : IBM Buying Lombardi: A Bauble on their BPM Christmas Tree?</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-13536</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 : IBM Buying Lombardi: A Bauble on their BPM Christmas Tree?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-13536</guid>
		<description>[...] will become part of the WebSphere team, which is what I said that they should have done with FileNet’s BPM three years ago when that acquisition ha...; maybe they’ll do this one right so that the product actually becomes an integral part of IBM’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will become part of the WebSphere team, which is what I said that they should have done with FileNet’s BPM three years ago when that acquisition ha&#8230;; maybe they’ll do this one right so that the product actually becomes an integral part of IBM’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 : Oracle-BEA versus IBM-FileNet: the Borg versus death by a thousand cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-13535</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 : Oracle-BEA versus IBM-FileNet: the Borg versus death by a thousand cuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-13535</guid>
		<description>[...] few days later, an analyst call with IBM set me straight on that: the GM of the IBM Information Management unit that would be absorbing FileNet referred to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days later, an analyst call with IBM set me straight on that: the GM of the IBM Information Management unit that would be absorbing FileNet referred to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 : IBM FileNet P8 BPM V4.5</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-10947</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 : IBM FileNet P8 BPM V4.5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-10947</guid>
		<description>[...] acquisition, specifically my comments at the time that the acquisition was announced, at an analyst briefing just after that, then a follow-up last June comparing it to the Oracle-BEA acquisition: in brief, I noted the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] acquisition, specifically my comments at the time that the acquisition was announced, at an analyst briefing just after that, then a follow-up last June comparing it to the Oracle-BEA acquisition: in brief, I noted the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECM-BPM Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-5190</link>
		<dc:creator>ECM-BPM Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-5190</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>L</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-5187</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-5187</guid>
		<description>Not sure that Blogger is the problem; this installation of Movable Type seems to have problems with trackbacks and spam tracking, and I often have to find them and ping my own trackback manually using Haloscan if I want it tracked, or try to find it in the trackbacks junk folder.

I&#039;m hoping that IBM makes the best of it, but I&#039;m imagining that in five years, FileNet&#039;s current content management will just be subsumed into IBM&#039;s Content Manager. I have better hopes for FileNet&#039;s BPM, which could be used to nicely round out IBM&#039;s Websphere BPM offerings. Assuming that someone at IBM figures out that it&#039;s not just &quot;content-centric&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that Blogger is the problem; this installation of Movable Type seems to have problems with trackbacks and spam tracking, and I often have to find them and ping my own trackback manually using Haloscan if I want it tracked, or try to find it in the trackbacks junk folder.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that IBM makes the best of it, but I&#8217;m imagining that in five years, FileNet&#8217;s current content management will just be subsumed into IBM&#8217;s Content Manager. I have better hopes for FileNet&#8217;s BPM, which could be used to nicely round out IBM&#8217;s Websphere BPM offerings. Assuming that someone at IBM figures out that it&#8217;s not just &#8220;content-centric&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Ayres</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-5186</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Ayres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-5186</guid>
		<description>Sandy,

Nice round up of thoughts and insights. I hope that IBM can really make something of the talent and technology inside FileNet, not just use it as a crowbar to get into the customer base.

Cheers
Phil

PS
If Blogger was smart it would have managed a trackback to your post, but its not. &lt;a href=&quot;http://improving-nao.blogspot.com/2006/08/on-being-acquired-by-bigger-ecm-vendor.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here is where I linked you&lt;/a&gt; where I discuss some of my thoughts about how I hope IBM behaves moving forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy,</p>
<p>Nice round up of thoughts and insights. I hope that IBM can really make something of the talent and technology inside FileNet, not just use it as a crowbar to get into the customer base.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Phil</p>
<p>PS<br />
If Blogger was smart it would have managed a trackback to your post, but its not. <a href="http://improving-nao.blogspot.com/2006/08/on-being-acquired-by-bigger-ecm-vendor.html" rel="nofollow">Here is where I linked you</a> where I discuss some of my thoughts about how I hope IBM behaves moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Improving New Account Opening</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-5189</link>
		<dc:creator>Improving New Account Opening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-5189</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On being acquired by a bigger ECM vendor&lt;/strong&gt;

...EMC seemed to get it right with Documentum. Will IBM get it right with FileNet?

Just to round up the thoughts out there, Sandy Kemsley did a nice round up of the comments around the Big Blue acquisition of FileNet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On being acquired by a bigger ECM vendor</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;EMC seemed to get it right with Documentum. Will IBM get it right with FileNet?</p>
<p>Just to round up the thoughts out there, Sandy Kemsley did a nice round up of the comments around the Big Blue acquisition of FileNet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-5188</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/comments-on-the-ibm-filenet-acquisition/#comment-5188</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;links for 2006-08-15&lt;/strong&gt;

i was wondering what Sandy would have to aay on this, and she&#039;s linked to enough content that it may not even be worth writing up my own thoughts on it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>links for 2006-08-15</strong></p>
<p>i was wondering what Sandy would have to aay on this, and she&#8217;s linked to enough content that it may not even be worth writing up my own thoughts on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

