<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM buys FileNet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 : IBM FileNet P8 BPM V4.5</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/comment-page-1/#comment-10945</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 : IBM FileNet P8 BPM V4.5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/#comment-10945</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged in the past about the IBM-FileNet acquisition, specifically my comments at the time that the acquisition was announced, at an analyst briefing just after that, then a follow-up last June comparing it to the Oracle-BEA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged in the past about the IBM-FileNet acquisition, specifically my comments at the time that the acquisition was announced, at an analyst briefing just after that, then a follow-up last June comparing it to the Oracle-BEA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 : Oracle-BEA versus IBM-FileNet: the Borg versus death by a thousand cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/comment-page-1/#comment-8012</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 : Oracle-BEA versus IBM-FileNet: the Borg versus death by a thousand cuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/#comment-8012</guid>
		<description>[...] two years ago, I reported on the IBM acquisition of FileNet, wherein I quoted their plan to &#8220;integrate IBM&#8217;s BPM and SOA technologies with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two years ago, I reported on the IBM acquisition of FileNet, wherein I quoted their plan to &#8220;integrate IBM&#8217;s BPM and SOA technologies with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Improving New Account Opening</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/comment-page-1/#comment-5185</link>
		<dc:creator>Improving New Account Opening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/#comment-5185</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;IBM platform for massive systems re-engineering?&lt;/strong&gt;

This morning&#039;s announcement by IBM that it intends to acquire FileNet was a little surprising. Many observers had been suggesting that FileNet would drop soon, but I don&#039;t believe anyone guessed to IBM. My outsider view was that there was far too muc...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>IBM platform for massive systems re-engineering?</strong></p>
<p>This morning&#8217;s announcement by IBM that it intends to acquire FileNet was a little surprising. Many observers had been suggesting that FileNet would drop soon, but I don&#8217;t believe anyone guessed to IBM. My outsider view was that there was far too muc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/comment-page-1/#comment-5184</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/#comment-5184</guid>
		<description>Rod, I&#039;ll ignore the totally self-serving remarks in your comment ;-)  but I do tend to agree with you: the conference call that I was on really downplayed BPM and referred to FileNet&#039;s BPM as &quot;content-centric&quot;, which gives you a good idea of how it&#039;s perceived, regardless of the actual capabilities. I think that this is a great opportunity for the mid-sized BPM firms such as Lombardi to make a play, since FileNet BPM sales are sure to stumble until the final strategy is clarified significantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rod, I&#8217;ll ignore the totally self-serving remarks in your comment <img src='http://www.column2.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   but I do tend to agree with you: the conference call that I was on really downplayed BPM and referred to FileNet&#8217;s BPM as &#8220;content-centric&#8221;, which gives you a good idea of how it&#8217;s perceived, regardless of the actual capabilities. I think that this is a great opportunity for the mid-sized BPM firms such as Lombardi to make a play, since FileNet BPM sales are sure to stumble until the final strategy is clarified significantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/comment-page-1/#comment-5183</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2006/08/ibm-buys-filenet/#comment-5183</guid>
		<description>We at Lombardi believe that IBM is focused on their Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions. The IBM announcement discussed integrating their BPM and Service Oriented Architecture technologies with the FileNet platform, mention of FileNet&#039;s BPM product was noticeably absent. We think FileNet decided to throw in the towel because they have not been able to execute on BPM – just look at leading analyst opinions from this year. This is a positive development for the BPM leaders like Lombardi, since we view it as yet another opportunity for us gain further market share in the rapidly growing BPM category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We at Lombardi believe that IBM is focused on their Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions. The IBM announcement discussed integrating their BPM and Service Oriented Architecture technologies with the FileNet platform, mention of FileNet&#8217;s BPM product was noticeably absent. We think FileNet decided to throw in the towel because they have not been able to execute on BPM – just look at leading analyst opinions from this year. This is a positive development for the BPM leaders like Lombardi, since we view it as yet another opportunity for us gain further market share in the rapidly growing BPM category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
