<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gartner Day 3: Microsoft session</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/comment-page-1/#comment-7049</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/#comment-7049</guid>
		<description>Chris, check out my recent posts on the Forrester and Gartner reports on BPM -- they both have specific criteria that limits which products are included in their analysis. All of the reports are available for download from various vendors&#039; sites, or you can buy them directly from Forrester or Gartner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, check out my recent posts on the Forrester and Gartner reports on BPM &#8212; they both have specific criteria that limits which products are included in their analysis. All of the reports are available for download from various vendors&#8217; sites, or you can buy them directly from Forrester or Gartner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Han</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/comment-page-1/#comment-7048</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/#comment-7048</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sandy.

That explains why Microsoft was not even on gartner BPM Magic Quadrant.

It seems different venders have their own definition of BPM solution. I wonder what are the commonly agreed criterias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sandy.</p>
<p>That explains why Microsoft was not even on gartner BPM Magic Quadrant.</p>
<p>It seems different venders have their own definition of BPM solution. I wonder what are the commonly agreed criterias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macehiter Ward-Dutton</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/comment-page-1/#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>Macehiter Ward-Dutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2007/02/gartner-day-3-microsoft-session/#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Has Microsoft got BPM?&lt;/strong&gt;

In October Microsoft finally got SOA (kind of)... now has it got BPM?

I&#039;ve not had a briefing on Microsoft&#039;s BPM initiative, but I did see the announcement of the Business Process Alliance partner initiative. And I also read Sandy on Microsoft&#039;s B...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Has Microsoft got BPM?</strong></p>
<p>In October Microsoft finally got SOA (kind of)&#8230; now has it got BPM?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not had a briefing on Microsoft&#8217;s BPM initiative, but I did see the announcement of the Business Process Alliance partner initiative. And I also read Sandy on Microsoft&#8217;s B&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
