<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FASTforward: Next-Generation Innovation in Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2008/02/fastforward-next-generation-innovation-in-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/02/fastforward-next-generation-innovation-in-search/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/02/fastforward-next-generation-innovation-in-search/comment-page-1/#comment-7382</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2008/02/fastforward-next-generation-innovation-in-search/#comment-7382</guid>
		<description>I found some of the things that their customers are doing to be quite innovative (although search is not my area of specialization so possibly I'm off the mark here). Driving content in portals -- what Clare Hart referred to as search without the search box -- and the application integration case that I saw on the last day. In both cases, search was buried in the inherent functionality, not an explicit user feature: is that what you mean by the elimination of search?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found some of the things that their customers are doing to be quite innovative (although search is not my area of specialization so possibly I&#8217;m off the mark here). Driving content in portals &#8212; what Clare Hart referred to as search without the search box &#8212; and the application integration case that I saw on the last day. In both cases, search was buried in the inherent functionality, not an explicit user feature: is that what you mean by the elimination of search?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Todhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/02/fastforward-next-generation-innovation-in-search/comment-page-1/#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>James Todhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2008/02/fastforward-next-generation-innovation-in-search/#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>All very nice, but not at all progressive.  True content-consumer based search must be integrated with the consumers information use model to provide optimal contextual knowledge delivery.  In effect, you could say that the future of search lies in its elimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very nice, but not at all progressive.  True content-consumer based search must be integrated with the consumers information use model to provide optimal contextual knowledge delivery.  In effect, you could say that the future of search lies in its elimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
