<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bookmarks for September 26th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2008/09/bookmarks-for-september-26th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/09/bookmarks-for-september-26th/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why BPEL Matters : BPMLab</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/09/bookmarks-for-september-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-9700</link>
		<dc:creator>Why BPEL Matters : BPMLab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/?p=1573#comment-9700</guid>
		<description>[...] on BPM 2.0, Sandy Kemsley, one of the few independent analysts covering the BPM space, was quick to agree with our updated definition of BPM 2.0, at the exception of one point (out of sixteen): support for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on BPM 2.0, Sandy Kemsley, one of the few independent analysts covering the BPM space, was quick to agree with our updated definition of BPM 2.0, at the exception of one point (out of sixteen): support for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux - Why&#160;BPEL</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/09/bookmarks-for-september-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-9411</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux - Why&#160;BPEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/?p=1573#comment-9411</guid>
		<description>[...] on BPM 2.0, Sandy Kemsley, one of the few independent analysts covering the BPM space, was quick to agree with our updated definition of BPM 2.0, at the exception of one point (out of sixteen): support for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on BPM 2.0, Sandy Kemsley, one of the few independent analysts covering the BPM space, was quick to agree with our updated definition of BPM 2.0, at the exception of one point (out of sixteen): support for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
