<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle-BEA Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2008/10/oracle-bea-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/10/oracle-bea-strategy/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/10/oracle-bea-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-9719</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2008/10/oracle-bea-strategy/#comment-9719</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the analysts are taking a &quot;wait and see&quot; attitude about Oracle -- they don&#039;t want to be naysayers about the big O, but they&#039;re really not sure how all this confusion is going to go down in the marketplace. I completely agree with you, Oracle has made this much to complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the analysts are taking a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; attitude about Oracle &#8212; they don&#8217;t want to be naysayers about the big O, but they&#8217;re really not sure how all this confusion is going to go down in the marketplace. I completely agree with you, Oracle has made this much to complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Neihaus</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2008/10/oracle-bea-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-9567</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Neihaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2008/10/oracle-bea-strategy/#comment-9567</guid>
		<description>Hi, Sandy. 

For us, it&#039;s pretty simple: there&#039;s no reason -- none -- that creating services-based applications has to be this hard. I&#039;ll bet Oracle customers get a headache just thinking about what this combination or that permutation could be.

If Oracle is taking a beating, it&#039;s not due to the slow pace of enterprise development. Instead, it&#039;s because no customer -- even their current ones -- should be expected to engineer Oracle piece parts together into coherent products by themselves in their own shop. And that&#039;s precisely what Oracle is forcing them to do, because everyone knows this fundamental truth about commercial software development: what was designed as a separate product remains a separate product, even when you smash it together with some glue or UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Sandy. </p>
<p>For us, it&#8217;s pretty simple: there&#8217;s no reason &#8212; none &#8212; that creating services-based applications has to be this hard. I&#8217;ll bet Oracle customers get a headache just thinking about what this combination or that permutation could be.</p>
<p>If Oracle is taking a beating, it&#8217;s not due to the slow pace of enterprise development. Instead, it&#8217;s because no customer &#8212; even their current ones &#8212; should be expected to engineer Oracle piece parts together into coherent products by themselves in their own shop. And that&#8217;s precisely what Oracle is forcing them to do, because everyone knows this fundamental truth about commercial software development: what was designed as a separate product remains a separate product, even when you smash it together with some glue or UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
