<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2009-02-02</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/comment-page-1/#comment-10994</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/#comment-10994</guid>
		<description>Mark, I&#039;m pretty obsessive, so save up my TV recordings to watch them in order, and read books from front to back - sorry to burst your bubble on that one. You should be much less certain about my TV viewing, reading and business habits than you claim to be.

That being said, I am not debating that sometimes things happen in a different order; I was taking exception to your use of the word &quot;series&quot; to mean an unordered list, when several definitions explicitly define it as an ordered list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I&#8217;m pretty obsessive, so save up my TV recordings to watch them in order, and read books from front to back &#8211; sorry to burst your bubble on that one. You should be much less certain about my TV viewing, reading and business habits than you claim to be.</p>
<p>That being said, I am not debating that sometimes things happen in a different order; I was taking exception to your use of the word &#8220;series&#8221; to mean an unordered list, when several definitions explicitly define it as an ordered list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGregor</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/comment-page-1/#comment-10993</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/#comment-10993</guid>
		<description>Sandy, always good to have debate. So am I to assume that you have never watched a TV series out of order, or read a book without going through the pages exactly one after another. If we also look at some of the other definitions of series we will also see that they talk about logical groupings. Whilst order may be implied it does not have to follow exactly.

I am certain that in your own businesses while you may have had a sales process with a series of activities you will have carried out the process with the activities being performed in many different sequences. e.g. as human beings we can see that there are a number of different tasks that need to be performed, but we also have the ability to choose the order depending on the circumstances.

I think the debate is actually different as witnessed by Frank&#039;s addition to the subject. He states that he disagrees with the dictionary definition. My whole point is that many if the more technical people out there are placing their own definition on words, in other words creating an &quot;alternate&quot; dictionary. For as long as this continues we will always find that business people for the most part will not properly engage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy, always good to have debate. So am I to assume that you have never watched a TV series out of order, or read a book without going through the pages exactly one after another. If we also look at some of the other definitions of series we will also see that they talk about logical groupings. Whilst order may be implied it does not have to follow exactly.</p>
<p>I am certain that in your own businesses while you may have had a sales process with a series of activities you will have carried out the process with the activities being performed in many different sequences. e.g. as human beings we can see that there are a number of different tasks that need to be performed, but we also have the ability to choose the order depending on the circumstances.</p>
<p>I think the debate is actually different as witnessed by Frank&#8217;s addition to the subject. He states that he disagrees with the dictionary definition. My whole point is that many if the more technical people out there are placing their own definition on words, in other words creating an &#8220;alternate&#8221; dictionary. For as long as this continues we will always find that business people for the most part will not properly engage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Michael Kraft&#8217;s Blog &#187; What is a Process? Procedure vs. Process</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/comment-page-1/#comment-10906</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Michael Kraft&#8217;s Blog &#187; What is a Process? Procedure vs. Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/02/links-for-2009-02-02/#comment-10906</guid>
		<description>[...] the Blog Column 2 - links for 2009-02-02 we see the statement that refutes the difference between process and procedure as claimed by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Blog Column 2 &#8211; links for 2009-02-02 we see the statement that refutes the difference between process and procedure as claimed by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

