<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TOGAF V9 Enterprise Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raghu Krovvidi</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-13005</link>
		<dc:creator>Raghu Krovvidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/#comment-13005</guid>
		<description>I see acceptance of technology certifications (e.g: Microsoft, Cisco, Oracle etc.) is more prevalent in the industry vs vendor agnostic cerfication like TOGAF. I do understand the great benefits that TOGAF brings to the table, however, the stakeholders are not realizing these benefits and this is resulting in weak acceptance and adoption of TOGAF in the enterprise. How can this be improved so that every enterprise will atleast have a TOGAF certifed EA? Any thoughts and comments are welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see acceptance of technology certifications (e.g: Microsoft, Cisco, Oracle etc.) is more prevalent in the industry vs vendor agnostic cerfication like TOGAF. I do understand the great benefits that TOGAF brings to the table, however, the stakeholders are not realizing these benefits and this is resulting in weak acceptance and adoption of TOGAF in the enterprise. How can this be improved so that every enterprise will atleast have a TOGAF certifed EA? Any thoughts and comments are welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/#comment-10871</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great point, Vilas: EA is often done as a monolithic disconnected project, doomed to failure by both of those characteristics. An incremental approach using something like TOGAF makes it easier to adopt as it evolves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, Vilas: EA is often done as a monolithic disconnected project, doomed to failure by both of those characteristics. An incremental approach using something like TOGAF makes it easier to adopt as it evolves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vilas Prabhu</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-10870</link>
		<dc:creator>Vilas Prabhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/#comment-10870</guid>
		<description>One good thing that is coming to attention that Enterprise Architecture is not a project to be done and forgotten. Rather it is a &#039;business as usual&#039; activity.  Every enterprise has some architecture (may not be the best). Enterprises can only improve what they already have. There is no option of replacing existing architecture with a new shiny one in one fall swoop. It needs an evolutionary approach. TOGAF does support that thinking and makes it implementable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One good thing that is coming to attention that Enterprise Architecture is not a project to be done and forgotten. Rather it is a &#8216;business as usual&#8217; activity.  Every enterprise has some architecture (may not be the best). Enterprises can only improve what they already have. There is no option of replacing existing architecture with a new shiny one in one fall swoop. It needs an evolutionary approach. TOGAF does support that thinking and makes it implementable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-02-02 &#171; steinarcarlsen</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-10857</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-02-02 &#171; steinarcarlsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/02/togaf-v9-enterprise-edition/#comment-10857</guid>
		<description>[...] TOGAF V9 Enterprise Edition (tags: cx ea togaf) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TOGAF V9 Enterprise Edition (tags: cx ea togaf) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

