<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dynamic BPM versus agility #GartnerBPM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2009/10/dynamic-bpm-versus-agility-gartnerbpm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/dynamic-bpm-versus-agility-gartnerbpm/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamic Exception Handling or Adaptive Goals? &#124; Adaptive Case Management</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/dynamic-bpm-versus-agility-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-18259</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamic Exception Handling or Adaptive Goals? &#124; Adaptive Case Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/dynamic-bpm-versus-agility-gartnerbpm/#comment-18259</guid>
		<description>[...] Sandra Kemsely posted on &#8216;Dynamic&#8217; BPM at the time: &quot;Gartner’s definition of dynamic BPM is the ability to support process change by any role, at any time, with very low latency. Change agents include everyone from customers and business people through business and process analysts, and on to architects and developers. &#8230; This isn’t just about each individual’s personal preferences for how they work, however: if knowledge workers can make changes to their processes, they will tend to make them more efficient and effective, which has enterprise benefits. &#8230; A significant part of this is the inclusion of explicit rules within processes, so that scenario-driven rule sets can detect and respond to conditions &#8230; services composition environments and CEP I felt didn’t really belong in a presentation on dynamic BPM &#8230;&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sandra Kemsely posted on &#8216;Dynamic&#8217; BPM at the time: &#8220;Gartner’s definition of dynamic BPM is the ability to support process change by any role, at any time, with very low latency. Change agents include everyone from customers and business people through business and process analysts, and on to architects and developers. &#8230; This isn’t just about each individual’s personal preferences for how they work, however: if knowledge workers can make changes to their processes, they will tend to make them more efficient and effective, which has enterprise benefits. &#8230; A significant part of this is the inclusion of explicit rules within processes, so that scenario-driven rule sets can detect and respond to conditions &#8230; services composition environments and CEP I felt didn’t really belong in a presentation on dynamic BPM &#8230;&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Following Gartner&#8217;s #BPM Conference #GartnerBPM</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/dynamic-bpm-versus-agility-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12455</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Following Gartner&#8217;s #BPM Conference #GartnerBPM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/dynamic-bpm-versus-agility-gartnerbpm/#comment-12455</guid>
		<description>[...] JT&#8217;s notes from Jim Sinur&#8217;s &#8220;Dynamic BPM and Agility&#8221; session.  Deeper coverage of themes that Jim has covered in his blog.  Sandy&#8217;s take here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JT&#8217;s notes from Jim Sinur&#8217;s &#8220;Dynamic BPM and Agility&#8221; session.  Deeper coverage of themes that Jim has covered in his blog.  Sandy&#8217;s take here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

