<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hidden costs of unstructured processes #GartnerBPM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: When will the Artists take over from the Technicians? &#124; HRM Today</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-13626</link>
		<dc:creator>When will the Artists take over from the Technicians? &#124; HRM Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-13626</guid>
		<description>[...] and others have suggested that as much as 60% of an organization’s processes are unstructured – and probably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and others have suggested that as much as 60% of an organization’s processes are unstructured – and probably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When will the Artists take over from the Technicians? &#124; Four Groups&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-13609</link>
		<dc:creator>When will the Artists take over from the Technicians? &#124; Four Groups&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-13609</guid>
		<description>[...] and others have suggested that as much as 60% of an organization’s processes are unstructured – and probably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and others have suggested that as much as 60% of an organization’s processes are unstructured – and probably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPM Frontier: Dynamic Processes - Process Is The Main Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12979</link>
		<dc:creator>BPM Frontier: Dynamic Processes - Process Is The Main Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12979</guid>
		<description>[...] following estimate was made at Gartner&#8217;2009 conference: as much as 60% of an organization’s processes are unstructured – and probably also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following estimate was made at Gartner&#8217;2009 conference: as much as 60% of an organization’s processes are unstructured – and probably also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12968</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12968</guid>
		<description>Hi Jacob, I definitely thought of your product when writing about this. I also agree that Google Wave could be a game-changer here: at SAP TechEd last week, I asked the group that had developed Gravity (process modeler inside Google Wave) if they intended to extend the Google Wave ideas to collaboration during process execution, although the answer was somewhat non-committal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jacob, I definitely thought of your product when writing about this. I also agree that Google Wave could be a game-changer here: at SAP TechEd last week, I asked the group that had developed Gravity (process modeler inside Google Wave) if they intended to extend the Google Wave ideas to collaboration during process execution, although the answer was somewhat non-committal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Ukelson</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Ukelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12937</guid>
		<description>Sandy,
  Hi. These are exactly the kind of processes that we address here at ActionBase. One thing to be careful with is that you want to provide enough structure to the process to add value, but not so much as to strangle it. Given that most of these processes are executed today via documents and email, we built our tool as an extension to those standard office tools - allowing the same ad-hoc feel, but adding a layer of management, tracking and reporting.

For many of these processes an initial formal model is overkill (and at odds with the needs of most knowledge workers) - at most you want a guideline or  best practice that gets modified as the work gets done. Then these emerging models can later be used to create a more formal model if needed (I&#039;ve blogged on the topic of in-situ process discovery on our blog http://blog.actionbase.com/in-situ-process-discovery).  

In general we&#039;ve found that need to provide most BPMS&#039;s with a completely defined formal process model is at odds with the management of unstructured processes. Unstructured processes  support needs to be part lightweight process tool, part collaboration tool.

Of course, I am an advocate for our tool - but I think Google Wave could also be a game changer in this space - if Google decides to take it in that direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy,<br />
  Hi. These are exactly the kind of processes that we address here at ActionBase. One thing to be careful with is that you want to provide enough structure to the process to add value, but not so much as to strangle it. Given that most of these processes are executed today via documents and email, we built our tool as an extension to those standard office tools &#8211; allowing the same ad-hoc feel, but adding a layer of management, tracking and reporting.</p>
<p>For many of these processes an initial formal model is overkill (and at odds with the needs of most knowledge workers) &#8211; at most you want a guideline or  best practice that gets modified as the work gets done. Then these emerging models can later be used to create a more formal model if needed (I&#8217;ve blogged on the topic of in-situ process discovery on our blog <a href="http://blog.actionbase.com/in-situ-process-discovery)" rel="nofollow">http://blog.actionbase.com/in-situ-process-discovery)</a>.  </p>
<p>In general we&#8217;ve found that need to provide most BPMS&#8217;s with a completely defined formal process model is at odds with the management of unstructured processes. Unstructured processes  support needs to be part lightweight process tool, part collaboration tool.</p>
<p>Of course, I am an advocate for our tool &#8211; but I think Google Wave could also be a game changer in this space &#8211; if Google decides to take it in that direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12926</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12926</guid>
		<description>Carol, thanks for the clarification, looks like an interesting technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol, thanks for the clarification, looks like an interesting technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12925</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12925</guid>
		<description>Dennis -- the BPMS vendors are looking for ways to incorporate &quot;barely repeatable processes&quot; into their systems, allowing users to create their own ad hoc processes on the fly but still capturing the audit trail so that it&#039;s not just happening over email or the phone in an unaudited fashion. The idea is not to pre-define all of these processes, but to provide tools that allow process participants to have a sufficiently unstructured environment to do what they need to do, and augment that process with their own call-out at that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis &#8212; the BPMS vendors are looking for ways to incorporate &#8220;barely repeatable processes&#8221; into their systems, allowing users to create their own ad hoc processes on the fly but still capturing the audit trail so that it&#8217;s not just happening over email or the phone in an unaudited fashion. The idea is not to pre-define all of these processes, but to provide tools that allow process participants to have a sufficiently unstructured environment to do what they need to do, and augment that process with their own call-out at that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-10-11 &#171; Ex Orbite</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12842</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-10-11 &#171; Ex Orbite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12842</guid>
		<description>[...] Column 2 : Hidden costs of unstructured processes #GartnerBPM (tags: BPM gartner process productivity business enterprise20 consulting unstructured structured) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Column 2 : Hidden costs of unstructured processes #GartnerBPM (tags: BPM gartner process productivity business enterprise20 consulting unstructured structured) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thingamy</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12421</link>
		<dc:creator>thingamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12421</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Gartner &quot;getting it&quot;?...&lt;/strong&gt;

(At least they&#039;ve found a huge issue, but not so much a solution.) Always a pleasure to read a blog post with &quot;revelations&quot; like this: &quot;...the hidden costs of unstructured processes: although a lot of focus of BPM efforts (time......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Gartner &#8220;getting it&#8221;?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>(At least they&#8217;ve found a huge issue, but not so much a solution.) Always a pleasure to read a blog post with &#8220;revelations&#8221; like this: &#8220;&#8230;the hidden costs of unstructured processes: although a lot of focus of BPM efforts (time&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djebar hammouche</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12394</link>
		<dc:creator>djebar hammouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/10/hidden-costs-of-unstructured-processes-gartnerbpm/#comment-12394</guid>
		<description>from my experiences:

before to structure unstructered/complex things decide if it was useful or: feasable   try to structure social, km, case management or cep  process.  Another reflexion : minimum of chaos is source of  imporovment/adaptation/agility.  cf frozen process vs hot process

some tips:
-follow an learning by doing/show me  aproaches are more easy  to build an  first version of &quot;main process&quot; models:  record each step/branch of the process steps graph  
-you can discover and improve by considering exceptions case  and simulations : whatif scenarios.
-Use process logs to build concrete  facts as support  for modelling decision elements
-follow more than one  end to end process execution to consolidate bp 
-consider an  management to operationnal agent roundtrip  to refine descriptions (multi scales/multi level approach)
--ask to all stakeholders processes to consolidate terms and rules.
-Try to use paperboard and animated models to validate models.  rewind features are very useful. 
-ask to Enterprise people to play  bp game  and comment theirs actions: Run more than one  this game, and each time ,  changing  each role performers to consolidate these models. 

in final paraphrasing this sentence from Stebdhal, famous french writer : Business Aechitecture is an mirror that walk along the enterprise landscape...

kind regards 
djebar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from my experiences:</p>
<p>before to structure unstructered/complex things decide if it was useful or: feasable   try to structure social, km, case management or cep  process.  Another reflexion : minimum of chaos is source of  imporovment/adaptation/agility.  cf frozen process vs hot process</p>
<p>some tips:<br />
-follow an learning by doing/show me  aproaches are more easy  to build an  first version of &#8220;main process&#8221; models:  record each step/branch of the process steps graph<br />
-you can discover and improve by considering exceptions case  and simulations : whatif scenarios.<br />
-Use process logs to build concrete  facts as support  for modelling decision elements<br />
-follow more than one  end to end process execution to consolidate bp<br />
-consider an  management to operationnal agent roundtrip  to refine descriptions (multi scales/multi level approach)<br />
&#8211;ask to all stakeholders processes to consolidate terms and rules.<br />
-Try to use paperboard and animated models to validate models.  rewind features are very useful.<br />
-ask to Enterprise people to play  bp game  and comment theirs actions: Run more than one  this game, and each time ,  changing  each role performers to consolidate these models. </p>
<p>in final paraphrasing this sentence from Stebdhal, famous french writer : Business Aechitecture is an mirror that walk along the enterprise landscape&#8230;</p>
<p>kind regards<br />
djebar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
