Comments on: Patterns for Business Process Implementations #GartnerBPM http://www.column2.com/2009/10/patterns-for-business-process-implementations-gartnerbpm/ BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business. Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sandy Kemsley http://www.column2.com/2009/10/patterns-for-business-process-implementations-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12930 Sandy Kemsley Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:05:56 +0000 http://www.column2.com/2009/10/patterns-for-business-process-implementations-gartnerbpm/#comment-12930 Step 1 is definitely code. Steps 2-5 should be done in a relatively codeless composition environment, but are often code. Step 1 is definitely code. Steps 2-5 should be done in a relatively codeless composition environment, but are often code.

]]> By: Process for the Enterprise » Blog Archive » Following Gartner’s #BPM Conference #GartnerBPM http://www.column2.com/2009/10/patterns-for-business-process-implementations-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12454 Process for the Enterprise » Blog Archive » Following Gartner’s #BPM Conference #GartnerBPM Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:11:28 +0000 http://www.column2.com/2009/10/patterns-for-business-process-implementations-gartnerbpm/#comment-12454 [...] Patterns presented by Benoit Lheureux and scribed by Sandy. [...] [...] Patterns presented by Benoit Lheureux and scribed by Sandy. [...]

]]> By: Scott Francis http://www.column2.com/2009/10/patterns-for-business-process-implementations-gartnerbpm/comment-page-1/#comment-12401 Scott Francis Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:11:26 +0000 http://www.column2.com/2009/10/patterns-for-business-process-implementations-gartnerbpm/#comment-12401 Funny, those five styles of flow, I think we could translate as follows: 1. code 2. more code 3. even more code 4. some human guidance 5. something the business cares about. :) As for the x-enterprise stuff - i don't think that is primarily a technical issue - its a business issue. someone has to be "switzerland" to make that kind of thing work - providing the grease for the gears. Funny, those five styles of flow, I think we could translate as follows:
1. code
2. more code
3. even more code
4. some human guidance
5. something the business cares about.

:)
As for the x-enterprise stuff – i don’t think that is primarily a technical issue – its a business issue. someone has to be “switzerland” to make that kind of thing work – providing the grease for the gears.

]]>