<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Launching #BPMcamp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2009/11/launching-bpmcamp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/11/launching-bpmcamp/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/11/launching-bpmcamp/comment-page-1/#comment-13148</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/11/launching-bpmcamp/#comment-13148</guid>
		<description>Sandy - 

As I responded in the comment on our blog - we think the multi-vendor concept has legs, but we wanted to try it single-vendor first, so that there won&#039;t be any limitations to the discussions that might lose people from different vendor communities. 

Afterward we&#039;ll have a good impression of how much really was vendor-specific or benefited from having a vendor-specific-community in attendance. 

I am betting that we have critical mass to start getting some unconference -style formats off the ground for BPM.  We&#039;ll sure find out! 

We&#039;ll certainly appreciate advice and input from others on this event, but I guess I should apologize in advance for all the advice that we end up either failing to take or failing to execute :)  We&#039;ll do our best - 

scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy &#8211; </p>
<p>As I responded in the comment on our blog &#8211; we think the multi-vendor concept has legs, but we wanted to try it single-vendor first, so that there won&#8217;t be any limitations to the discussions that might lose people from different vendor communities. </p>
<p>Afterward we&#8217;ll have a good impression of how much really was vendor-specific or benefited from having a vendor-specific-community in attendance. </p>
<p>I am betting that we have critical mass to start getting some unconference -style formats off the ground for BPM.  We&#8217;ll sure find out! </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll certainly appreciate advice and input from others on this event, but I guess I should apologize in advance for all the advice that we end up either failing to take or failing to execute <img src='http://www.column2.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   We&#8217;ll do our best &#8211; </p>
<p>scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

