<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More BPM Acquisitions: Progress Buys Savvion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13625</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13625</guid>
		<description>John, I think that the bigger concern is that Lombardi&#039;s product strengths are lost in the vast portfolio of IBM products, or that the nonsensical &quot;departmental&quot; marketing message means that the IBM sales force doesn&#039;t consider this a contender for enterprise sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I think that the bigger concern is that Lombardi&#8217;s product strengths are lost in the vast portfolio of IBM products, or that the nonsensical &#8220;departmental&#8221; marketing message means that the IBM sales force doesn&#8217;t consider this a contender for enterprise sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13622</link>
		<dc:creator>John Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13622</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s just say that I&#039;ve already filled out my direct deposit form for IBM :-)

Some folks seem pretty spooked, worried that Business folks are going to get shut out of the development cycle because Lombardi and Savvion have both been acquired by companies that are well known for their SOA prowess... I just don&#039;t see that happening.

What I see is more of a win-win - IT gets &quot;a single throat to choke&quot; and Business gets tools from vendors who have the resources to push the envelope.  Imagine the Teamworks/Blueprint mashup that Lombardi could have built by now if pockets had been deeper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s just say that I&#8217;ve already filled out my direct deposit form for IBM <img src='http://www.column2.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Some folks seem pretty spooked, worried that Business folks are going to get shut out of the development cycle because Lombardi and Savvion have both been acquired by companies that are well known for their SOA prowess&#8230; I just don&#8217;t see that happening.</p>
<p>What I see is more of a win-win &#8211; IT gets &#8220;a single throat to choke&#8221; and Business gets tools from vendors who have the resources to push the envelope.  Imagine the Teamworks/Blueprint mashup that Lombardi could have built by now if pockets had been deeper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13619</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13619</guid>
		<description>Tim, that would be great for all involved -- there&#039;s no benefit to dragging this out, although traditionally there can be quite a bit of time between when IBM announces an acquisition and when it closes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, that would be great for all involved &#8212; there&#8217;s no benefit to dragging this out, although traditionally there can be quite a bit of time between when IBM announces an acquisition and when it closes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13618</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13618</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Lombardi/IBM deal should close sometime in the next week or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Lombardi/IBM deal should close sometime in the next week or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; And Savvion goes to Progress #BPM</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13617</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; And Savvion goes to Progress #BPM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13617</guid>
		<description>[...] Kemsley&#8217;s analysis is that the most likely opportunity is CEP + BPM (since Progress has the Apama CEP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kemsley&#8217;s analysis is that the most likely opportunity is CEP + BPM (since Progress has the Apama CEP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Appian Insight &#187; (Nearly) Everyone Wins in the Savvion Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13613</link>
		<dc:creator>Appian Insight &#187; (Nearly) Everyone Wins in the Savvion Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13613</guid>
		<description>[...] Column2, Sandy Kemsley writes: “Of the three mid-range BPMS-only vendors that I would most commonly name – Appian, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Column2, Sandy Kemsley writes: “Of the three mid-range BPMS-only vendors that I would most commonly name – Appian, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Travers</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13612</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Travers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13612</guid>
		<description>Sandy, excellent analysis on both the Savvion and Lombardi acquisitions.  I actually had thought Savvion would have been picked-up a few years ago but it now happened.  Again, thanks for your great article.

Mark Travers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy, excellent analysis on both the Savvion and Lombardi acquisitions.  I actually had thought Savvion would have been picked-up a few years ago but it now happened.  Again, thanks for your great article.</p>
<p>Mark Travers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13607</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13607</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I assumed that if they got me out of bed early for a 7:30am call, they had already briefed all of you who are 5 times zones to the east!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I assumed that if they got me out of bed early for a 7:30am call, they had already briefed all of you who are 5 times zones to the east!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ward-Dutton</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/comment-page-1/#comment-13606</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Ward-Dutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/01/more-bpm-acquisitions-progress-buys-savvion/#comment-13606</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link Sandy! Just for the record though I didn&#039;t have the benefit of a briefing... my analysis was from the news release only. Hoping to get a briefing soon..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Sandy! Just for the record though I didn&#8217;t have the benefit of a briefing&#8230; my analysis was from the news release only. Hoping to get a briefing soon..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

